→ April, 2015
→ March, 2015
→ February, 2015
→ January, 2015
→ December, 2014
→ November, 2014
→ October, 2014
→ July, 2014
→ May, 2014
→ April, 2014
→ March, 2014
→ February, 2014
→ January, 2014
→ December, 2013
→ October, 2013
→ September, 2013
→ August, 2013
→ July, 2013
→ June, 2013
→ May, 2013
→ April, 2013
→ March, 2013
→ February, 2013
→ January, 2013
→ December, 2012
→ November, 2012
→ October, 2012
→ September, 2012
→ August, 2012
→ July, 2012
→ June, 2012
→ May, 2012
→ April, 2012
→ March, 2012
→ February, 2012
→ January, 2012
→ December, 2011
→ November, 2011
→ October, 2011
→ September, 2011
→ August, 2011
→ July, 2011
→ June, 2011
→ May, 2011
→ April, 2011
→ March, 2011
→ February, 2011
→ January, 2011
→ December, 2010
→ November, 2010
→ October, 2010
→ September, 2010
→ August, 2010
→ July, 2010
→ June, 2010
→ May, 2010
→ April, 2010
→ March, 2010
→ February, 2010
→ January, 2010
→ December, 2009
→ November, 2009
→ October, 2009
→ September, 2009
→ August, 2009
→ July, 2009
→ June, 2009
→ May, 2009
→ April, 2009
→ March, 2009
→ February, 2009
→ January, 2009
→ December, 2008
→ November, 2008
→ October, 2008
→ September, 2008
→ August, 2008
→ July, 2008
→ June, 2008
→ May, 2008
→ April, 2008
→ March, 2008
→ February, 2008
→ January, 2008
→ December, 2007
→ November, 2007
→ October, 2007
→ September, 2007
→ August, 2007
→ July, 2007
Thank you, President Bush
And Navy SEALs
|Mohammed and His Slave |
Muhammad the Criminal Mastermind of Arabia and Allah His Imaginary Slave
Allah Supports the Crimes of His Creator - Prophet Muhammad in the Quran
The supposed God of the Universe must be of Moral Perfection, so would His representatives on earth. Allah duly claims the same about Prophet Muhammad in the Quran. Therefore, the Hadiths would outline a character and personality of Muhammad that would be of moral perfection. If there is anything said in the Quran or any character and personality traits of Muhammad in the hadiths lacks moral perfection, that would negate the Quran to be the word of God , and Muhammad's claims of being the Prophet of God. In other words, if any words or deeds of Muhammad in authentic hadiths shows him spreading unjustified hatred of non-Muslims, unjustified degradation or denigration women or any other human beings, unjustified act of violence, unjustified act of leading or ordering or planning wars, let alone ordering murders, massacres, rape, enslavement, booty, child molestation, sex slavery, stoning, maiming, terror, torture invoking the name of God, then Muhammad could not be a prophet of God but a fraud.
Allah guides Prophet Muhammad in committing crimes
It is supposed that God created man in His own image. As far Muhammad is concerned, it seems he transformed the Arab Pagan God Allah into his image, and did even better in bestowing upon that Allah his own characteristics, personality, desires and ambitions. Whether it was Muhammad's own desire for sexually molesting little girls or grabbing other people's properties or his ambition for gaining power and dominion, Muhammad had Allah facilitate the fulfillment of those desires and ambitions of his.
CHILD MOLESTATION and RAPE
Allah fulfills Muhammad's desire for sexually abusing and raping a little girls.
Muhammad desired to molest the little girl Aisha, daughter of his closest disciple and friend Abu Bakr. She was only 6 years old. To fulfill Muhammad's desire, first Allah came to dream to show Aisha picture wrapped in silk, telling Muhammad that she would be his wife (Hadith).
That the Prophet said to her, “You have been shown to me twice in my dream. I saw you pictured on a piece of silk and some-one said (to me). ‘This is your wife.’ When I uncovered the picture, I saw that it was yours. I said, ‘If this is from Allah, it will be done.”
Then Allah gave Muhammad another sanction for molesting and raping little girls in the Quran, saying that it was legal to marry a prepubescent child awaiting her first menstruation (65:4):
"And those of your women as have passed the age of monthly courses, for them the 'Iddah (prescribed period), if you have doubts (about their periods), is three months, and for those who have no courses [(i.e. they are still immature) their 'Iddah (prescribed period) is three months likewise, except in case of death]. And for those who are pregnant (whether they are divorced or their husbands are dead), their 'Iddah (prescribed period) is until they deliver (their burdens), and whosoever fears Allah and keeps his duty to Him, He will make his matter easy for him." Quran 65:4
MUHAMMAD: THE EXTERMINATOR
Allah guides Muhammad on massacring Banu Quraiza
After migrating to Medina, Muhammad came face to face with the Jews, the only people well-versed in Abrahamic religious doctrines. Muhammad tried to impress them to his religion, but instead they became a people who could pick out all the falsities in his Quranic verses. This is a problem Muhammad faced from no other people in Arabia, and it could potentially prove his Quran as fraud and destroy his religious mission. So, he wanted to eliminate them from the surface of the earth, but as powerful Medina leader Abdullah ibn Obayyi came to their support, he had to be content with exiling the Jews of Banu Qainuqa in 624 and Banu Nadir in 625. By 627, when he attacked Banu Quraiza, Abdullah had become weakened in power, and Muhammad could now ignore his opposition and exterminate the Jews which he had been longing for over 3 years now. Here's how Allah guided him in exterminating the Jewish tribe:
Sahi Bukhari 5:59:448:
“So Allah's Apostle went to them (i.e. Banu Quraiza) (i.e. besieged them). They then surrendered to the Prophet's judgment (unconditionally after 25 days of fierce resistance) but he directed them to Sad (ally) to give his verdict concerning them. Sad said, "I give my judgment that their warriors should be killed, their women and children should be taken as captives, and their properties distributed."
The Prophet said, "You have judged according to the King's (Allah's) judgment." (Bukhari 5:447)
The sentence: Death by decapitation for around 600 men and pubescent boys, and enslavement for the women and children. Ibn Ishaq says that the number may have been as high as 800-900 (p. 464).
|Posted by Southern on Saturday, April 25, 2015 @ 21:57:15 EDT (12 reads) |
|Goebbels and the Jihadist Youth |
The Big Lie as propaganda device has a long and dishonorable history, gulling onto complacency those who prefer to avoid unpleasant worries. The Nazi propagandist Goebbels was its most notable practitioner, but for sheer numbers and historical roots, no other group can match the efforts of jihadist Muslims, with their religiously—sanctioned practice of deceiving infidels to protect the faith.
Andrew G. Bostom
Al—Jazeera aired on March 24, 2006, a rather chilling, one—sided 'dialogue' between representatives of Arab and Danish student organizations who met in Damascus, ostensibly to discuss the violent worldwide Muslim reactions following publication of the Muhammad cartoons by the Danish paper Jyllands—Posten. Video clips and a written transcript of this event are available through the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI).
Ahmad Al—Shater, Chairman of the Arab Students Union, and his Sudanese Student Union colleague 'Muhammad,' were unremittingly truculent in their presentations, which melded classic taquiyya (sanctioned dissimulation of Islamic doctrine to 'protect' the faithful), or sheer ignorance, Muslim Jew—hatred, and a Goebbels—like distortion of contemporary events, including the requisite conspiratorial Judenhass (Jew—hatred).
Al—Shater began by stating that it was the nefarious 'Zionists' and 'imperialists' who had deliberately misrepresented Islam by wrongfully associating the religion with terrorism. He asserted categorically:
According to the Islamic religion, even in times of war, it is forbidden to uproot a tree, it is forbidden to kill a woman, it is forbidden to kill a child, it is forbidden to destroy wells... It is forbidden to fill wells with earth... Water wells... It is forbidden to harm human life, it is forbidden to destroy a church, it is forbidden to attack a religious belief...
Classical Islamic doctrines on jihad war, and more importantly the actual practice of jihad campaigns in accord with this theory, put the lie to Al—Shater's uninformed or deliberately taquiyya—laden assertions. Al—Shater's basic contention that 'it is forbidden to attack a religious belief' is patently absurd—the archetypal proto—jihad campaigns of Muhammad himself imposed Islam and Islamic suzerainty upon the pagans, Jews, and Christians of ancient Arabia, and continue to provide the rationale for aggressive jihad imperialism to this day.
For example, Muhammad, according to a summary of sacralized Muslim sources,
..waited for some act of aggression on the part of the Jews of Khaybar, whose fertile lands and villages he had destined for his followers...to furnish an excuse for an attack. But, no such opportunity offering, he resolved in the autumn of this year [i.e., 628], on a sudden and unprovoked invasion of their territory.
Ali (later, the fourth 'Rightly Guided Caliph', and especially revered by Shi'ite Muslims) asked Muhammad why the Jews of Khaybar were being attacked, since they were peaceful farmers, tending their oasis, and was told by Muhammad he must compel them to submit to Islamic Law. The renowned early 20th century scholar of Islam, David Margoliouth, observed aptly:
Now the fact that a community was idolatrous, or Jewish, or anything but Mohammedan, warranted a murderous attack upon it.
|Posted by Southern on Saturday, April 25, 2015 @ 21:39:55 EDT (12 reads) |
|Obama's IS Strategy, Decoded |
President Obama was being needlessly modest when he told reporters he had no strategy for dealing with the Islamic State.
He does, in fact, have a strategy; it's just been buried under a pile of bloated, JV-league cliches.
After carefully reviewing his many statements on the topic over the past months, we've managed to piece the president's line of reasoning together into a more or less coherent statement.
To wit, with all the supporting quotes to back it up:
IS is no big deal since they're just one of many terror groups . ..
"I think it's important for us to recognize that ISIL is just one of a number of organizations that we have to stay focused on." — June 22
... and they're bush league to boot.
"The analogy we use around here sometimes, and I think is accurate, is if a JV team puts on Lakers uniforms, that doesn't make them Kobe Bryant." — Jan. 27
Besides, we just can't attack every two-bit group than hangs a terrorist shingle out.
"What we can't do is think that we're just going to play whack-a-mole and send U.S. troops occupying various countries wherever these organizations pop up." — June 22
Ha! Just kidding! IS is a threat to the region and to the U.S.
"We have an interest in making sure that a group like ISIL, which is a vicious organization and has been able to take advantage of the chaos in Syria, that they don't get a broader foothold." — Aug. 18
They are, in fact, a tumor in need of surgery ...
"Rooting out a cancer like ISIL will not be quick or easy, but I'm confident that we can — and we will." — Aug. 28
... and removal.
"Our objective is clear, and that is to degrade and destroy ISIL so that it's no longer a threat not just to Iraq, but also the region and to the United States." — Sept. 3
So our plan is to, um, push back on them just a bit ...
"My priority at this point is to make sure that the gains that ISIL made in Iraq are rolled back." — Aug. 28
... and try to make IS a situation we can deal with.
"If we are joined by the international community, we can continue to shrink ISIL's sphere of influence, its effectiveness, its financing, its military capabilities to the point where it is a manageable problem." —Sep. 3
In any case, rest assured that we're doing as little as possible . ..
"I want to make sure everybody is clear on what we're doing now, because it is limited. Our focus right now is to protect American personnel on the ground in Iraq; to protect our embassy, to protect our consulates." — Aug. 28
. . . because there's no military solution to this terror threat . ..
"As I said when I authorized these operations, there is no American military solution to the larger crisis in Iraq."—Aug. 11
... even though our troops could kick the Islamic State's butt if we let them.
"Our military is the best in the world. We can route ISIL on the ground." — Aug. 28
Which we never will ...
|Posted by Southern on Saturday, April 25, 2015 @ 01:10:30 EDT (14 reads) |
|Geert Wilders: War Has Been Declared against Us |
A Speech in the Netherlands Parliament
During the past ten years and two days, the ostrich cabinets did nothing. Every warning was ignored. They lied to the people.
Do not prevent jihadists from leaving our country. Let them leave. I am prepared to go to Schiphol [airport] to wave them goodbye. But let them never come back.
Madam Speaker, war has been declared against us.
Madam Speaker, actually I was expecting flowers from you. I am celebrating an anniversary these days. Exactly ten years and two days ago, I left a party whose name I cannot immediately remember. During these ten years and two days. I have been much criticized. Most importantly for always saying the same thing.
My critics are right. Indeed, my message had been the same during all these years. And today, I will repeat the same message about Islam again. For the umpteenth time. As I have been doing for ten years and two days.
I have been vilified for my film Fitna. And not just vilified, but even prosecuted. Madam Speaker, while not so many years ago, everyone refused to broadcast my film Fitna, we can today watch Fitna 2, 3, 4 and 5 daily on our television screens. It is not a clash of civilizations that is going on, but a clash between barbarism and civilization.
The Netherlands has become the victim of Islam because the political elite looked away. Here, in these room, they are all present, here and also in the Cabinet, all these people who looked away. Every warning was ignored.
As a result, also in our country today, Christians are being told: "We want to murder you all." Jews receive death threats. Swastika flags at demonstrations, stones go through windows, Molotov cocktails, Hitler salutes are being made, macabre black ISIS flags wave in the wind, we hear cries, such as "F-ck the Talmud," on the central square in Amsterdam.
Indeed, Madam Speaker, this summer, Islam came to us.
|Posted by Southern on Saturday, April 25, 2015 @ 00:54:00 EDT (11 reads) |
|Soetoro To America: ISholes Are Your Future |
White House official: The Islamic State is the next administration’s problem
The word of the day is “deliberate.”
On Thursday morning, White House Deputy National Security Advisor Tony Blinken said that the Obama administration is seeking to combat the Islamic State threat, as it executes one “terrorist attack” after another against the United States, in a “deliberate” fashion. That’s a far more generous way of confessing to near paralytic dithering.
Last week, President Barack Obama admitted that his administration does not “have a strategy yet” for attacking the Islamic State in its Syrian stronghold. On Wednesday, noting in the same speech that his administration would seek to “destroy” ISIS and/or “shrink” it into a “manageable problem,” he revealed that he does not really even have a single objective in mind for how to deal with the Islamic State.
The White House has begun to push back on an increasingly panicked press, the members of which appear to have come to the reluctant conclusion that there is no hand on the tiller, noting that both can be true: You can “shrink,” “degrade,” make “manageable,” and eventually “destroy” ISIS. While this may be true, the words of the president and his subordinates leave the listener with the impression that this is a policy being crafted on the fly.
Blinken told MSNBC’s Morning Joe that the United States is stalling on responding forcefully to crimes against humanity and the United States committed by ISIS because they are attempting to build a robust international coalition. “We’ve got to look before we leap,” he said. “We tried the opposite a decade ago, and that didn’t help us very much in the Middle East.”
Nearly six years after George W. Bush left the White House, the Obama White House has been completely unable to even approach his ability to craft an international coalition. They ruthlessly mocked the size of the 48-member strong force that engaged in combat and nation building in Iraq in 2003 because it did not include France and Canada, but defend the execution of perfectly unilateral military action in Iraq today and demand you consider it consistency.
But this is not the only language of the Bush years Blinken appropriated this week. Appearing on CNN on Wednesday, the deputy national security advisor told Wolf Blitzer that the fight against ISIS may be – like the once-defunct War on Terror – a generational struggle. Except he did not say that. Blinken said that throttling the nascent Islamic State in the crib is a project for the next occupant of the Oval Office.
|Posted by Southern on Friday, April 24, 2015 @ 23:52:42 EDT (10 reads) |
|Soetoro Sides With Libyans |
Obama Ignores Congress, Lifts Ban on Libyans Training in U.S. as Pilots, Nuke Scientists
Less than two years after four Americans got massacred in a terrorist attack on the U.S. Special Mission in Benghazi, Libya the Obama administration is disregarding congressional opposition to lift a decades-old ban on Libyans attending flight schools and training as nuclear scientists in the United States.
The ban was implemented in 1983 after a wave of terrorist incidents involving Libyans. The African nation continues to be a hotbed of terrorism and in fact, the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli was recently evacuated because violence between rival militias has created a deadly environment. Many other foreign governments have also shut down their embassies in Libya because the violence has spread throughout the entire country.
Nevertheless, President Obama has discounted congressional opposition to let Libyans train as pilots, airplane mechanics and nuclear scientists in the United States. Perhaps the commander-in-chief has somehow forgotten that many of the 9/11 hijackers—mostly Saudi nationals—received their training in American flights schools because our government allowed it. Have we not learned that it’s a really bad idea to help our enemies obtain skills that could later be used to attack us?
Official word of this senseless change comes via a final regulation approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). It lifts the longtime prohibition on Libyans coming to the U.S. to attend flight school, work in aviation maintenance or flight operations or to study or train in nuclear science. The Obama administration claims that the ban is no longer necessary because the “United States Government and the Government of Libya have normalized their relationship and most of the restrictions and sanctions imposed by the United States and the United Nations toward Libya have been lifted.”
The move comes just a few months after a congressional hearing addressed what was then the administration’s proposal to overturn the 30-year ban. Before actually reversing the longtime regulation, the administration was required to provide Congress with certain documents that were never provided, according to the heads of the House Judiciary Committee and House Oversight and Government Reform Committee considering the matter. In other words, the president has once again blown off Congress and this week the lawmakers involved in the process expressed outrage.
“The Obama Administration is turning a blind eye to real terrorist threats that exist in Libya today by carelessly forging ahead with its plan to allow Libyan pilots and nuclear scientists to study in the United States,” said House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte. “The House Judiciary Committee has repeatedly sought information about the Administration’s policy reversal but political appointees at the Department of Homeland Security have stonewalled the Committee’s requests and have not articulated why it is in Americans’ best interests to change policy. Given the ongoing volatility in Libya, it is unconscionable and completely irresponsible that the Administration plans to lift a longstanding policy that protects Americans and our national security from threats in the region.”
At the congressional hearing earlier this year, a top Homeland Security official revealed that the Hillary Clinton State Department first requested the Libyan ban lift in 2010. Three years later, the official, Alan Bersin, told Congress, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano agreed to begin the process to amend the regulations relating to Libya. This illustrates that the administration started working to lift the ban long before the 2012 terrorist attack on the U.S. Special Mission Compound in Benghazi. Clearly, it was not enough to deter the administration from going forth with its dangerous plan.
|Posted by Southern on Friday, April 24, 2015 @ 23:43:21 EDT (8 reads) |
- Friday, April 24, 2015
- Friday, March 13, 2015
- Saturday, March 07, 2015
- Saturday, February 21, 2015
- Friday, February 20, 2015
- Wednesday, January 21, 2015
- Friday, December 05, 2014
- Thursday, December 04, 2014
- Tuesday, December 02, 2014
- Thursday, November 27, 2014
- Older Articles
Set as Homepage
16:31, The hoary head is a crown of glory, if it be found in the way of righteousness.