|
NukeSentinel™ |
This is the list of NukeSentinel(tm) banned IP addresses.
- 168.62.9.*
- 217.182.252.*
- 176.31.162.*
- 80.215.203.*
- 13.72.78.*
- 94.102.59.*
- 77.180.125.*
- 5.135.125.*
- 135.181.44.*
- 27.124.127.*
- 129.205.244.*
- 179.61.158.*
- 23.94.184.*
- 144.168.166.*
- 85.105.83.*
- 23.94.154.*
- 107.175.80.*
- 192.227.191.*
- 144.168.227.*
- 192.3.25.*
| |
NukeSentinel™ |
 We have caught 2621 shameful hackers.
| |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
Hamas and Black Lives Matter: A marriage made in hell ![header=[Read More...]body=[] Read More...](modules/News/css/images/transparent.gif) |
Only the BDS Movement stands to gain from this union.
Lee Kaplan
The writer heads Stop the ISM. He is an investigative journalist and contributor to Front Page Magazine, senior intelligence analyst and communications director for the Northeast Intelligence Network, and also heads Defending America for Knowledge and Action (DAFKA). He appears frequently in the US media.
In October 2014, the U.S. Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation (a clearinghouse for the International Solidarity Movement, ISM) ended their Boycott Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) organizing conference against Israel in San Diego, California.
At the conclusion of the weekend event, their lead organizer, Anna Piller, alias Anna Baltzer, a woman with a deceased Jewish grandmother but no foundation in or knowledge of Judaism herself, who makes her living promoting Boycott, Divest, Sanction (BDS) for Arab terrorist groups, sent out an email blast. In it she urged her followers to descend on Ferguson, Missouri in 2015 and demonstrate with black American radicals there about the shooting of Michael Brown, a black 17 year-old robber who was killed by a Ferguson police officer when the youth tried to steal the officer’s gun after attacking him. Brown had just robbed a liquor store. That email also broadsided a cry for action “From Ferguson to Palestine,” bringing the BDS movement and Palestinian groups, both domestic and abroad, to ally with U.S. black “liberation” groups and radicals, and tying the goals of Hamas to domestic complaints by American blacks over alleged unfair treatment by US law enforcement.
A “delegation” of Arab Palestinians from Gaza and the Palestinian Authority, college-age Arab activists, arrived in Missouri to plot strategy and tactics with Baltzer’s ISM group and similar groups in the USA shortly after Brown was killed. Jeff PIckert, alias Max Suchan, another member of the ISM, was arrested by Ferguson police during the riots that ensued for inciting black crowds to riot and attack the police.
The U.S. Department of Justice later proved that the officer acted in self-defense, but despite this, a national campaign was launched gaining prominence in mainstream media and led mostly by Black Lives Matter (BLM) activists such as Cornel West and the Revolutionary Communist Party (RCP)in the U.S. led by Bob Avakian, whose purposes were to incite revolutionary violence against the police and white America.
The RCP is not the same as the Communist Party USA, but made up of more militant blacks who espouse violence against whites as part of their communist revolution. Their numbers would be swelled by BDS activists and pro-Hamas groups to riot on the streets of America through this cooperation.
One BLM co-founder from Toronto, Yusra Khogali, is a black woman who is also a practicing Muslim and calls for murdering white people on the Internet. This alliance facilitated recruitment of Islamists and anarchists as well as some black liberation group leaders for planning and rioting against the police. Riots followed in Baltimore, when another black man under arrest died in police custody and more recently in Milwaukee, where rioters called for blacks to murder white people, even though the riot catalyst was a black police officer who shot an armed black felon in a gunfight. Black members of the Revolutionary Communist Party were observed by police strolling through the crowds along with BDS activists inciting the riots.  |
 |
Posted by Southern on Monday, September 14, 2020 @ 21:27:39 EDT (225 reads)
                
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
More Fast Radio Bursts ![header=[Read More...]body=[] Read More...](modules/News/css/images/transparent.gif) |
Six more fast radio bursts have been discovered coming from the same mystery cosmic source
Repeating FRBs came from same location far beyond the Milky Way where 10 had previously been detected.
Hannah Osborne
Six additional repeating fast radio bursts have been discovered coming the same unknown source in space. The FRBs came from the same region beyond the Milky Way where 10 bursts had previously been detected – and their discovery should give a greater insight into what caused them.
FRBs are radio signals from deep space that last just a few milliseconds. The first FRB was detected in 2001 and since then over a dozen have been found in telescope data. However, these all appeared to be one-off events, with no two bursts coming from the same location. This means follow-up observations were not possible, keeping their source a mystery.
Current theories as to their cause involve a cataclysmic event like a neutron star collapsing into a black hole or a supernova. Another option is they are coming from a young, highly magnetised, extragalactic neutron star.
In March, scientists announced the discovery of the first repeating FRBs. Ten bursts were recorded coming from the same direction as FRB 121102 – a spot in space far beyond the Milky Way.
Their findings, published in the journal Nature, showed the bursts had the same dispersion measurements as the original FRB, indicating the source must have survived whatever event produced the FRB in the first place. As a result, the bursts cannot be being produced by a one-off event.
Bursts were discovered with the Green Bank telescope Jarek Tuszynski / Wikimedia Commons
 |
 |
Posted by Southern on Sunday, September 13, 2020 @ 12:58:39 EDT (207 reads)
                
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
Are the Constants of Physics Constant? ![header=[Read More...]body=[] Read More...](modules/News/css/images/transparent.gif) |
So far, they seem to be—but nobody really understands why
Venkat Srinivasan

The European Southern Observatory's Very Large Telescope, in Chile Image: European Southern Observatory/Flickr under Creative Commons License
When Max Born addressed the South Indian Science Association in November 1935, it was a time of great uncertainty in his life. The Nazi Party had already suspended the renowned quantum mechanics physicist's position at the University of Gottingen in 1933. He had been invited to teach at Cambridge, but it was temporary. Then, the Party terminated his tenure at Gottingen in the summer of 1935. Born took up an offer to work with C. V. Raman and his students for six months at the Indian Institute of Science in Bangalore. While there, he found that his family had lost its German citizenship rights. He was stateless and without a permanent home. And then, there was this uncertainty about two numbers.
The scientific world had been coming to terms with two numbers that had emerged after a series of discoveries and theories in the previous four decades. They were unchanging and they had no units. One, the fine structure constant, defined the strength of interactions between fundamental particles and light. It is expressed as 1/137. The other, mu, related the mass of a proton to an electron.
Born was after a unifying theory to relate all the fundamental forces of nature. He also wanted a theory that would explain where these constants came from. Something, he said, to “explain the existence of the heavy, and light elementary particles and their definite mass quotient 1840."
It might seem a little bizarre that Born worried about a couple of constants. The sciences are full of constants—one defines the speed of light, another quantifies the pull of gravity, and so on. We routinely use these numbers, flipping to dog-eared tables in reference books, and coding them into our software without much thought because, well, they are constants. But the weird thing about such constants is that there is no theory to explain their existence. They are universal and they appear to be unchanging. So is the case with the masses of protons and electrons. But time and time again, they are validated through observation and experiment, not theory.
What Born and so many others were after was a unifying theory that would demonstrate that there could only be one unchanging value for a constant. Without this theory, scientists resort to testing limits of a constant. Measuring the constant is a good way to verify that theories using them make sense, that science stands on firm ground. Error from the measurements can be a huge concern. So, instead of validating the masses of protons and electrons, it's useful to measure the ratio of their masses, a number that is free of the burden of units.  |
 |
Posted by Southern on Thursday, September 10, 2020 @ 13:19:14 EDT (223 reads)
                
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
GCalendar |
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |
|
|
| |
bookmark site |
Bookmark Us
Set as Homepage
| |
Proverbs |
15:5, A fool despiseth his father\s instruction: but he that regardeth reproof is prudent.
| |
Honey Pot |
We have [329] bots in the pot!
| |
|
| |