Site Menu

null.gif Home
null.gif MembersShow/Hide content
null.gif NewsShow/Hide content
null.gif DownloadsShow/Hide content
null.gif ContentShow/Hide content
null.gif SiteShow/Hide content
null.gif DrugsShow/Hide content
null.gif Physics
null.gif Nature
null.gif Poetry
null.gif Chess
null.gif Website
null.gif Internet
null.gif Tanakh

Site Info

Last SeenLast Seen
Server TrafficServer Traffic
  • Total: 9,142,249
  • Today: 3,452
Server InfoServer Info
  • Feb 27, 2021
  • 03:52 pm EST


This is the list of NukeSentinel(tm) banned IP addresses.

  • 217.182.252.*
  • 176.31.162.*
  • 80.215.203.*
  • 13.72.78.*
  • 94.102.59.*
  • 77.180.125.*
  • 5.135.125.*
  • 135.181.44.*
  • 27.124.127.*
  • 129.205.244.*
  • 179.61.158.*
  • 23.94.184.*
  • 144.168.166.*
  • 85.105.83.*
  • 23.94.154.*
  • 107.175.80.*
  • 192.227.191.*
  • 144.168.227.*
  • 192.3.25.*
  • 23.250.44.*


Thank you, Navy SEALs


You have been warned!
We have caught 2620 shameful hackers. America

Search on This Topic:   
[ Go to Home | Select a New Topic ]

Page 14 of 32 (190 total stories) [ << | < | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | > | >> ]   

American Heritage- KKK Lynching (killing) Republicans Score: More about Printer Friendly Send to a Friend Save as PDF
Posted by Southern on Thursday, October 14, 2010 @ 16:41:19 EDT (608 reads) 

The Founding Fathers Rejected Democracy Score: More about Printer Friendly Send to a Friend Save as PDF Read More...

Harold Pease

The Founding Fathers universally rejected democracy and hoped that posterity would never turn the United States into one. The word they used was “Republic,” which is not synonymous with “Democracy.” The word “Democracy” is not in the Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation, the Constitution, or the Bill of Rights. Even the Pledge of Allegiance is “to the Republic for which it stands.”

Benjamin Franklin defined democracy as “two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.”

So why did they reject Democracy? Because it is inherently flawed with the “share the wealth” philosophy, which only works as long as there is someone else’s money to share. Those receiving are quite pleased with getting something for nothing. But those forced to give are denied the right to spend the benefits of their own labor in their own self-interest, which creates jobs no matter how the money is spent. They also lose a portion of their incentive to produce.

Fraser Tyler, author of The Decline and Fall of the Athenian Republic authored more than 200 years ago said it best. “A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship.”

Where does the money come from for all the “good” that government does? Answer, out of someone else’s pocket. If it is with his consent it is a form of charity. If forced, a form of tyranny. The more and the longer given, the more entitled the receiver becomes until he is quite willing to take to the streets and demand more of other people’s money, fully satisfied that he has every right to it. This works until those who have money are destroyed as a class and everyone is equally poor. The result is a diminished standard of living for everyone, as was the case under 20th Century communism.

A Democracy gives us the principles of majority rules and frequent elections with options, but little more. It does not protect us from the government’s redistribution of wealth philosophy, which entitles the less productive to get something for nothing.

A Republic includes frequent elections with options. It also gives place to majority rules, but only to a point, for as your mother told you growing up, the majority is not always right. A Republic is also based upon natural unalienable rights that come from a source higher than man (for example life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.)

Posted by Southern on Thursday, October 14, 2010 @ 16:38:31 EDT (740 reads) 

Black Republicans Now & During the Reconstruction of America Score: More about Printer Friendly Send to a Friend Save as PDF Read More...

Black Republicans Make History

Frances Rice, National Black Republican Association

Congratulations to the black Republican candidates who won their primaries several months ago, as well as on June 22nd, the most notable of whom is Tim Scott of South Carolina who received over 68 percent of the vote in the Republican Party runoff. A Charleston resident, Scott is also a state representative and previously served 13 years on the Charleston County Council. He is vying to become South Carolina's first black Republican congressman in more than a century. If successful in November, Scott would be among the first black Republican legislators elected since the 2003 retirement of J.C. Watts from Oklahoma.

Scott and the other black Republican nominees, if elected in 2010, would join the ranks of the first blacks who were elected to Congress during the Reconstruction era - all Republicans. On the list that is posted on the NBRA website are the first two black Senators and the 21 black members of the House of Representatives.

Hiram Rhodes Revels of Mississippi was the first black elected as a United States Senator, serving from 1870 to 1871. He was followed in the Senate by black Republican Blanche K. Bruce of Mississippi. Republican Joseph Rainey of South Carolina was the first black to enter the House of Representatives.

During the era of Reconstruction, Democrats - using the Ku Klux Klan - launched a reign of terror against Republican leaders, especially black Republican elected officials. The brutal acts by Democrats was the reason there were no more black Republicans elected to Congress for nearly one hundred years, until the election of Edward Brooke of Massachusetts in 1966.

Racism in the Democratic Party - past and present - is buried by the liberal press since it does not fit within the media template where the Republican Party is painted as a racist party. The charge that the Republican Party lacks diversity prevails in spite of the existence of around two million black Republicans in America. Also disregarded by the media is the fact that a black man, Michael Steele, is chairman of the Republican National Committee.

Posted by Southern on Tuesday, October 12, 2010 @ 13:41:12 EDT (760 reads) 

Illegal Immigration Isn't a Joke Score: More about Printer Friendly Send to a Friend Save as PDF
Posted by Southern on Saturday, October 09, 2010 @ 01:33:54 EDT (598 reads) 

Narco-Terrorism: American Style Score: More about Printer Friendly Send to a Friend Save as PDF Read More...

Rusty Fleming

On a hot summer evening, in a bar in Nuevo Laredo, Mexico just across the bridge from Laredo, Texas; a thirty year-old man, on his knees, surrounded by a dozen armed guards, can be heard begging for his life, he cries for one more chance to make it right with the boss, one more chance to see his family—one more chance at life.

His boss happens to be the man who dictates the life and death of every soul in the Laredo corridor, listens to the pleas but has already made up his mind. He stands as judge and jury in this court and it’s clear, he’s heard enough. So he pulls a diamond studded, pearl handled pistol from his belt and slowly hands it over to one of his newest recruits. He tells the recruit to put a bullet in the condemned mans head as he sobs uncontrollably—and so, without hesitation the young man pulls the trigger four times over.

This was the new recruit’s first kill and his first real test for initiation to become an assassin of the Gulf Cartel’s enforcement arm known as the Zetas. He had never killed anyone before that night and when his cartel boss handed him the pistol and he pulled that trigger— he knew he loved it. He told me later that it gave him a rush that he had never felt before, “to kill a man and know I was going to get a way with it gave me a feeling of power” —He spoke of that night as if he had found his true calling—“I knew right then I was born to be a sicario” (Spanish for “hit-man”) He was thirteen years old.

I’ve met and talked with numerous players in the drug war being waged on our border and beyond, that have often left me feeling more than a little disturbed. The utter disregard for human life that’s evidenced in the daily tortures and executions taking place down here, certainly wears on the most seasoned of us reporting on it. But when I looked into the eyes of this young man and saw how he lit up inside while speaking so nonchalantly yet eloquently about how he “lived to kill” ever since he pulled that trigger for the first time, it sent cold chills down my spine—and still does. “I’ve killed men while they were tied and bound but that there is no thrill, no excitement in that for me. I prefer to stalk my target, hunt them down and then, after I know his moves front to back, I sneak up on them, look’em in the eyes and pull the trigger—now that’s a rush.”

I interviewed him a year before the mainstream media ever heard his name, Rosalio Reta, was born and raised in Laredo, Texas and recruited by the Zetas when he was barely in the 7th grade.

Posted by Southern on Tuesday, September 21, 2010 @ 17:07:40 EDT (1109 reads) 

This Is Where We Begin to Say No Score: More about Printer Friendly Send to a Friend Save as PDF Read More...

Andrew C. McCarthy

On the Ground Zero mosque, Americans reject the opinion elites that empower the Islamists.

A tectonic shift is in motion: How fitting that its focal point is Ground Zero, the inevitable fault line between Islam and the West.

Only the blink of an eye ago, uttering the unpleasant truth that in terms of doctrine there is no such thing as “moderate Islam” resulted in one’s banishment from what our opinion elites like to call the “mainstream,” by which they mean the narrow-minded, viciously defended circle of their own pieties and fictions. You could say it, but your skin had better have an extra coat or two of thick: You were in for a fusillade of rage, the likes of which our candor-phobic elites would never dream of unleashing at our Islamist enemies — no matter how clearly those enemies announced their intention to destroy us.

The fusillade still comes, but now its blows only glance. The elites and their mainstream have been exposed as frauds: Being on the wrong side of enough 70-30 issues will do that to you.

It should never have gotten this far. Sponsors of the Ground Zero mosque neither own the property in question nor possess the means to build and operate the palatial Islamic center they envision. The more light that shines on their record of murky real-estate dealings and the dubious circumstances of their limited stake in the Ground Zero property, the more questions arise. In a more sensible world, those questions would get answered before we plunged into a rancorous public debate. That hasn’t happened, though. In spite of the implacable determination of the mayor (and the attorney general who would be governor) to look the other way, the issue has galvanized the public. What has long bubbled beneath the surface did not need much more heat to boil over.

For the better part of two decades, Americans have been murdered by Islamists and then lectured that they are to blame for what has befallen them. We have been instructed in the need for special sensitivity to the unceasing demands of Islamic culture and falsely accused of intolerance by the people who wrote the book on intolerance. Americans have sacrificed blood and bottomless treasure for Islamic peoples who despise Americans — and despise us even more as our sacrifices and gestures of self-loathing intensify. Americans have watched as apologists for terrorists and sharia were made the face of an American Muslim community that we were simultaneously assured was the very picture of pro-American moderation.

Americans have had our fill. We are willing to live many lies. This one, though, strikes too close to home, arousing our heretofore dormant sense of decency. Americans have now heard Barack Obama’s shtick enough times to know that when he talks about “our values,” he’s really talking about his values, which most of us don’t share. And after ten years of CAIR’s tired tirades, we’re immune to Feisal Rauf, too.

Posted by Southern on Tuesday, September 14, 2010 @ 15:30:40 EDT (735 reads) 

Page 14 of 32 (190 total stories) [ << | < | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | > | >> ]   




© ThemeFreaks


<< February 2021 >>


bookmark site

Bookmark Us
Bookmark Us

Set as Homepage
Set as Homepage

Support RavenNuke™

RavenNuke(tm) v2.40.01


16:17, The highway of the upright is to depart from evil: he that keepeth his way preserveth his soul.

R.O.P.: R.I.P.

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Islam spreads like a virus....
more: Islam violence

List of Islamic Terror Attacks For the Past 2 Months

Support Our Troops

Support Our Troops

© ThemeFreaks

Honey Pot

Bots in the pot!
We have [328] bots in the pot!

Page Generation: 0.65 Seconds